Horses in Midstream breaks the mold of midterm election literature by focusing on the consequences of midterm elections rather than on the causes of the anti-administration pattern of those elections. The book concludes that the midterm pattern has two primary consequences: it stymies the President and provides an opportunity for the revitalization of the opposition party—and that numerical losses by the President's party is really only a small part of the equation. Consequently, midterm elections can be considered an additional check in the U.S. political system, acting as a mechanism that helps to assure rough two party balance. In examining the historical results from midterm elections dating back to 1894 and extending to the surprising result of 1994 and 1998, Busch has uncovered seven consistent ways in which the president and his party are harmed by midterm elections. These elections unfavorably alter the composition of congress, both between the parties and within the President's own party; they deprive the President of the plebiscitary power derived from his original electoral mandate; they give an intangible sense of momentum to the opposition party, leading to renewed opportunities for the opposition to put forward new leaders and to develop winning issues; they exacerbate splits within the President's own party; and they provide the opposition party with expanded party-building opportunities at the state level. Busch also places the midterm elections into four categories: “preparatory” midterms, which contribute to a subsequent change in party control of the Presidency; “calibrating” midterms in which voters slow but do not reverse extraordinary periods of Presidentially-driven change; “normal” midterms when midterm elections stymie the President without contributing to a White House takeover; and the rare “creative exceptions” when an administration escapes the midterm curse at the polls and find themselves invigorated rather than weakened. Busch's new approach to midterm elections, his well supported conclusions, and his clear, consistent style will certainly be of interest to political scientists and will translate well to the classroom.
Gives the 1958s, the 1962s, and the 1994s of U.S. history their due as social dramas, in which, respectivelly, the forces of Southern Republicanism, Democratic liberalism, and anti-Clinton rage began gearing up to change the country for good. By showing how the most interesting things in politics often happen when most people aren't paying attention, this book succeeds in knocking us out of our settled waysof thinking about politics.
Busch's work is an excellent addition to the realignment literature. For general readers, upper-division undergraduates, faculty, and practitioners.
Horses in Midstream is an entirely original treatment of an interesting, and given the 1994 election, important subject. No one has ever written an extended work on U.S. midterm elections before with an eye for their consequences, or with such a richly documented synthesis of material. This book will be an important contribution to political science's stock of literature on Congress and congressional elections.
Horses in Midstream makes a valuable and original contribution to the literature on congressional elections, casting new light on a feature of the electoral system that is so familiar we tend to take it for granted without fully appreciating its pervasive impact on our politics. His analysis shows us many of the important ways in which the political system would work differently if midterms were abolished. There is no other work with quite this focus.
Andrew E. Busch is assistant professor of political science at the University of Denver and author of, most recently, Horses in Midstream: U.S. Midterm Elections and Their Consequences.learn more