Examines the 1985 confrontation between police and members of the black counterculture group MOVE, which ended in the destruction of sixty-one homes and the death of eleven residents—five of them children. Sheds light on relevant issues such as negotiating with "irrational" adversaries and problems of perception and misperception when different cultures clash.
Hizkias Assefa is Associate Professor of Management and International Affairs at LaRoche College. He holds advanced degrees in law, economics, administration, and international affairs.
Paul Wahrhaftig is President of Conflict Resolution Center International, Inc., a world-wide resource for people mediating racial, ethnic, and religious conflicts.
“The MOVE crisis was a hard case for mediators. The MOVE Crisis gives us a breathtaking account of this social conflict that bristles with misunderstandings, escalating rhetoric, profound fears, competing legal principles, controversial law enforcement strategies, and wrenching political tradeoffs.”—Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution
"A well-written, humane, and persuasive account of an urban tragedy."
—Karl Bottigheimer, SUNY, Stonybrook
In 1985, police bombed the Philadelphia community occupied by members of the black counterculture group MOVE (short for “The Movement”). What began fifteen years earlier as a neighborhood squabble provoked by conflicting lifestyles ended in the destruction of sixty-one homes and the death of eleven residents - five of them children. Some 250 people were left homeless.
Was this tragedy the only solution to the conflict? Were John Africa and his morally and ecologically idealistic followers “too crazy” to negotiate with? Moreover, is any group? These are some of the questions discussed by Hizkias Assefa and Paul Wahrhaftig in The MOVE Crisis in Philadelpia: Extremist Groups and Conflict Resolution.
The authors interviewed MOVE members and their neighbors, third-party intervenors, and representatives of the Philadelpia administration in the 1970s, and draw on their own knowledge of the field of dispute resolution. More than simply describing a terrible event, they examine the dynamics of conflict, analyzing attempts at third-party mediation and the possibility of resolution without violence. Their analytical approach provides insight into other major conflicts, such as the problems of perception and misperception in U.S. - Iranian relations.
In an age when terrorism and hostage-taking are regular features on the six o’clock news, their questioning of traditional views on negotiation with “irrational” adversaries is especially important.