browsenews and eventsordering informationfor authorsprizesfor instructorsrights and permissionsdigital editionsEBooksAuthor Videoabout the pressSupport the Presscontact us
November 2010
232 pages  

6 x 9 1/4
9780822961222
Paper $24.95 Add to cart

View Cart
Check Out
Other Ways to order
Inessential Solidarity
Rhetoric and Foreigner Relations
Davis, Diane
This work examines critical intersections of rhetoric and solidarity in order to demonstrate that a rhetorical imperative—an underivable obligation to respond—is the condition for symbolic exchange, and therefore not only for the “art”of rhetoric, but for all determinate relations.

Winner of the 2010 JAC W. Ross Winterowd Award

Kindle eBook Available
Diane Davis is associate professor of Rhetoric & Writing and English at the University of Texas at Austin, and she holds the Kenneth Burke Chair of Rhetoric at the European Graduate School in Saas-Fee, Switzerland. Davis is the author of Breaking Up [at] Totality: A Rhetoric of Laughter, coauthor of Women’s Ways of Making It in Rhetoric and Composition, and editor of Reading Ronell and The UberReader: Selected Works of Avital Ronell.
Complete Description Reviews
Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture Table of Contents
Composition/Literacy Read a selection from this book
close 

In Inessential Solidarity, Diane Davis examines critical intersections of rhetoric and sociality in order to revise some of rhetorical theory’s basic presumptions. Rather than focus on the arguments and symbolic exchanges through which social relations are defined, Davis exposes an underivable rhetorical imperative, an obligation to respond that is as undeniable as the obligation to age. Situating this response-ability as the condition for, rather than the effect of, symbolic interaction, Davis both dissolves contemporary concerns about linguistic overdetermination and calls into question long-held presumptions about rhetoric’s relationship with identification, figuration, hermeneutics, agency, and judgment.

Spotlighting a rhetorical “situation” irreducible to symbolic relations, Davis proposes quite provocatively that rhetoric—rather than ontology (Aristotle/Heidegger), epistemology (Descartes), or ethics (Levinas)—is “first philosophy.” The subject or “symbol-using animal” comes into being, Davis argues both with and against Emmanuel Levinas, only inasmuch as it responds to the other; the priority of the other is not a matter of the subject's choice, then, but of its inescapable predicament. Directing the reader’s attention to this inessential solidarity without which no meaning-making or determinate social relation would be possible, Davis aims to nudge rhetorical studies beyond the epistemological concerns that typically circumscribe theories of persuasion toward the examination of a more fundamental affectability, persuadability, responsivity.

close 
close 

“An outstanding piece of scholarship, a fine read, and controversial, too. . . . A must read for those who have an interest in the philosophy of rhetoric and how such a philosophy is essential for maintaining the well-being of humankind.”—Rhetoric and Public Affairs

“I have come to view Diane Davis as one of today’s most insightful and provocative thinkers about rhetoric. Inessential Solidarity confirms me in that opinion as she incisively asks the most basic questions about rhetoric’s nature and function and productively challenges our most cherished assumptions about what rhetorical studies should be. Ultimately, this book is not just an important theoretical contribution to rhetorical studies; it is also a profound rhetorical contribution to critical theory at the forefront of contemporary thinking.” —Steven Mailloux, Loyola Marymount University


close 

© 2014 University of Pittsburgh Press. All rights reserved.