Browse | News & Events | Ordering | UPP Blog | For Authors | For Instructors | Prizes | Rights & Permissions | Hebrew Union College Press | About the Press | Support the Press | Contact Us
April 1999
224 pages  

6 x 9
9780822956921
Paper $25.95 Add to cart

View Cart
Check Out
Other Ways to order
Motives for Metaphor
Literacy, Curriculum Reform, and the Teaching of English
Seitz, James
Since metaphor, by its very definition, brings two different entities together, James Seitz argues that it is the key to successfully integrating the seemingly different disciplines that make up English studies.

View the Digital Edition
James E. Seitz received his Ph.D. in English from New York University. He taught and served as director of writing at Long Island University, Brooklyn, and is currently an assistant professor of English at the University of Pittsburgh, where he teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in composition, literature, and literacy education.
“We are, I think, at the end of an era, not only in composition but in English studies generally. . . . Not since the early 1960s have people in English more keenly felt the need for fresh perspectives. And fresh perspectives, among other things, is what this book has to offer. Quite apart from its innovations in the theory of metaphor, Seitz’s argument deserves a wide readership because of the new horizons it opens on teaching and research.”—Kurt Spellmeyer, Rutgers University

Complete Description Reviews
Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture
Composition/Literacy
close 

Despite urgent calls for reform, composition, literature, and creative writing remain territorial, competitive fields. This book imagines ways in which the three English camps can reconnect. Seitz contends that the study of metaphor can advance curriculum reform precisely because of its unusual institutional position. By pronouncing equivalence in the very face of difference, metaphor performs an irrational discursive act that takes us to the nexus of textual, social, and ideological questions that have stirred such contentious debate in recent years over the function of English studies itself. As perhaps the most radical (yet also quotidian) means by which language negotiates difference, metaphor can help us to think about the politics of identification and the curricular movements such a politics has inspired.
close 
close 


close 

© 2017 University of Pittsburgh Press. All rights reserved.